The UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill: What it Really Means for Compliance Teams

The proposed Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill isn’t just an update to existing rules. It’s a clear signal that government expectations around cyber resilience are rising, and that “good enough” security controls will no longer pass quietly.

For compliance and risk leaders, this isn’t something to park for later. It points to a broader shift in how resilience, assurance and accountability are expected to operate in practice.

A step change, not a clean break

At a technical level, the Bill builds on the existing NIS Regulations rather than replacing them outright. But the intent is clear: widen the scope, strengthen enforcement, and modernise how cyber risk is regulated across essential services and digital infrastructure.

What’s changing is not just who is in scope, but what regulators expect to see.

That includes:

• A broader range of organisations subject to cyber obligations.
• Increased regulatory powers to investigate, request evidence, and enforce compliance.
• Greater emphasis on incident reporting and transparency.
• A sharper focus on supply chains and third-party risk.

Taken together, this moves cyber compliance away from static documentation and toward demonstrable, ongoing resilience.

Why this matters beyond regulated sectors

Even for organisations that may not fall directly within scope today, the direction of travel should feel familiar.

We’re already seeing buyers, partners and insurers ask tougher questions around cyber resilience. Regulation often formalises expectations the market has already started to apply informally.

In practice, which means:

• Boards asking for clearer visibility of cyber risk.
• Procurement teams requesting stronger assurance from suppliers.
• Regulators expecting evidence that controls are operating, not just documented.

Compliance teams that rely on point-in-time audits or annual reporting cycles will find this increasingly difficult to sustain.

The quiet shift underneath the legislation

The most important change isn’t a single clause or requirement.

It’s the underlying assumption that cyber resilience is continuous, not episodic.

Historically, many organisations have treated compliance as something that intensifies around audits, certifications or incidents. The Bill reflects a growing recognition that this model no longer matches the reality of cyber risk.

Instead, expectations are moving toward:

• Controls that are monitored, not revisited once a year.
• Evidence that is available when requested, not assembled retrospectively.
• Clear ownership of risk across the organisation, rather than siloed in one team.
• A shared understanding of resilience, not just a technical view of security.

This is as much an operational shift as it is a regulatory one.

What compliance teams should be thinking about now?

The Bill is still progressing through Parliament, but waiting for final wording before acting would be a mistake.

For compliance leaders, recommended next steps include:

• Understanding exposure
  Mapping where your organisation, or your services, may fall within an expanded regulatory scope.
• Reviewing evidence practices
  Assessing whether your current approach relies on periodic reporting, or whether it reflects how controls operate day to day.‍
• Re-examining third-party risk
  Ensuring supplier assurance is structured, visible and defensible not informal or ad hoc.‍
• Aligning resilience with operations
  Making sure cyber risk is discussed and managed as part of normal business activity, not just compliance reporting.

These steps are valuable regardless of where the legislation ultimately lands.

The bigger picture

The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill reinforces a message that’s becoming hard to ignore cyber compliance is no longer about preparing for an audit.

It’s about being able to demonstrate resilience as part of how the organisation works.

For teams that have already moved toward continuous control monitoring, embedded ownership and real-time evidence, this shift will feel manageable.

For those that haven’t, it will feel uncomfortable, and increasingly unavoidable.

Building resilience shouldn’t start when regulation changes.

If your compliance programme still relies on point-in-time audits and retrospective evidence, now is the moment to reassess how it scales.

Hicomply helps organisations embed compliance into day-to-day operations, so evidence is available when regulators, boards or partners ask for it.

Explore how compliance can work as you do.

‍