April 18, 2024

NIST 800-53 vs. NIST CSF: What's The Difference?

Both the NIST 800-53 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) are widely used cybersecurity frameworks developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Both frameworks offer guidance on how organisations can secure their IT infrastructure to prevent, control, mitigate, and respond to cyber threats and incidents.

By
Full name
Share this post
A woman smiles while using a tablet, surrounded by digital notifications and a data chart.

While NIST CSF provides a broader framework for enhancing cybersecurity practices and policies, NIST 800-53 is a more comprehensive standard that provides specific security controls for each IT system.

Despite their commonalities, NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF include some key differences. Continue reading to understand the difference between NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF.

NIST CSF overview

NIST CSF is a voluntary framework designed to help organisations, regardless of size or industry, develop and implement comprehensive cybersecurity protocols and practices. It is intended to help organisations audit their existing cybersecurity practices, identify potential oversights and weak points, and build procedures and policies that enable agile threat detection and response procedures.

CSF is organised into five key functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. These functions are designed to include a set of outcomes that organisations can use to assess and improve their existing cybersecurity posture.

Because CSF is not geared towards any one industry or entity size, it is designed to be flexible and scalable. Therefore, while it provides a solid framework on which organisations can build their cybersecurity management programs, it lacks the comprehensive aspects of other standards.

NIST 800-53 overview

NIST 800-53 is an information and cybersecurity standard that provides guidelines for federal agencies, information systems, and third-party contractors that work with the United States government. While NIST 800-53 is a mandatory standard for these entities, many outside organisations choose to adhere to its standards and best practices to bolster their cybersecurity and information security policies and procedures.

NIST 800-53 includes a list of controls to support the development of resilient and secure federal information systems. It provides guidance to these entities on how to select, implement, and assess these provided security and privacy controls.

NIST 800-53 vs. NIST CSF: Similarities

The main similarities between these two standards are:

  • Both standards are developed and updated by NIST.
  • Both include guidelines for protecting information, IT, and security systems.
  • Both provide security controls and implementation guidance.
  • Both are designed to be adaptable to meet the specific needs of an organisation.
  • Both enable organisations to assess the effectiveness of their security controls.
  • Both include frameworks for continuous security development.

NIST 800-53 vs. NIST CSF: Differences

The primary differences between NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF are:

  • CSF is a voluntary framework for organisations, whereas NIST 800-53 is mandatory for federal information systems, agencies, and contractors with the US government.
  • CSF is a framework, while NIST 800-53 is a set of standards.
  • CSF is more focused on risk management, while NIST 800-53 provides detailed security controls.
  • CSF provides cybersecurity best practices, while NIST 800-53 provide security controls.

Learn more about NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF

Both NIST 800-53 and NIST CSF can be used by organisations to assess and enhance their cybersecurity practices, protocols and policies. To learn more about these frameworks and standards, please visit:

Contact Hicomply to learn more about compliance with these standards.

Risk Management
Compliance Reporting
Policy Management
Incident Management
Audits and Assessments

Ready to Take Control of Your Privacy Compliance?

See how Hicomply can accelerate your path to CAF compliance in a 15-minute demo.

Risk Management

Identify, assess, and mitigate security risks with an integrated risk register.Hicomply’s automated risk management software maps controls across ISO 27001, SOC 2, and NIST frameworks — helping teams track risk treatment plans, assign ownership, and monitor real-time compliance status.Build a resilient ISMS that reduces audit findings and demonstrates continuous improvement.

Compliance Reporting

Generate instant, audit-ready compliance reports across multiple frameworks — from ISO 27001 and SOC 2 to GDPR, DORA, and NHS DSPT.Automated evidence collection and built-in dashboards provide a single source of truth for your compliance posture, saving weeks of manual work during audits.

Policy Management

Centralise, version, and publish all your information security policies in one place.Hicomply automates approvals, reminders, and distribution, ensuring your ISMS documentation stays current and aligned with frameworks like ISO 42001 and NIST CSF.Say goodbye to outdated PDFs — manage policies dynamically and maintain full traceability.

Incident Management

Capture, investigate, and resolve security incidents with structured workflows and automated evidence trails.Hicomply integrates with ticketing tools like Jira, Zendesk, and Azure DevOps to streamline incident response and link findings to risk and control updates — a key step for SOC 2 Type II readiness.

Audits and Assessments

Simplify internal and external audit preparation with built-in audit templates and automated task assignments.
Hicomply’s audit management platform aligns with ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 14001, giving teams a clear overview of control effectiveness, audit evidence, and corrective actions — all from one dashboard.

Getting Started
IT and Services
Growth